Guides - Technical & Standards
OASIS UBL 2.1 vs. UN/CEFACT CII XML: Technical Comparison
Compare XML namespaces, element paths, and ERP compatibility between UBL and CII.
What this guide covers
Compare XML namespaces, element paths, and ERP compatibility between UBL and CII.
Information to confirm before using this format
Check the recipient’s required syntax, the applicable country profile, and the current validation rules. Invoice standards can change, and an accepted file may still be rejected by a specific buyer, public authority, or access point.
Related invoice tools
Use the linked viewer or validator to inspect a local XML file. Treat the result as a technical aid until the required official validation service is connected.
Frequently asked questions
Does OASIS UBL 2.1 vs. UN/CEFACT CII XML: Technical Comparison send my invoice to a server?
The available MVP interaction runs in your browser. Your selected file is not uploaded by this page.
Does this page certify an invoice as compliant?
No. The MVP can show basic fields and local checks, but it does not replace official XSD, Schematron, KoSIT, Peppol, or tax-authority validation.